<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Brookings: Projects - 21st Century Defense Initiative</title>
    <link>http://www.brookings.edu//projects/21defense.aspx?rssid=21defense</link>
    <description>Brookings Projects Feed</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:34:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
      <title>Video Game Veterans and the New American Politics</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/GwWjjADgdbU/1117_video_games_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/U/UP UZ/usarmy_computer001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Video Game Veterans and the New American Politics" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to Peter Singer, video games have become an effective recruiting tool for the military, and gaming technology has been used in everything from battle training to dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder.  However, while creating a new generation of soldiers primed for the fast-pace of modern warfare, Singer cautions that these games may also be desensitizing young people to the realities of war.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/GwWjjADgdbU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">087d886a-ee0d-4c13-a1d2-7e8b6a05b234</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1117_video_games_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Around the Halls: 20 Years After the Berlin Wall Fell</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/YMKOj1Ay8_E/1109_halls_berlinwall.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/B/BA BE/berlin_wall002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Around the Halls: 20 Years After the Berlin Wall Fell" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;November 9 marks the twenty-year anniversary of the opening of the Berlin Wall. With protests in the week prior totaling over one million, refugees were allowed to exit directly through crossing points between East Berlin and West Berlin and all along the border. In the days and weeks to follow the Wall would continue to fall, leading the way for Germany’s reunification. Experts from around the halls of Brookings respond to this historic anniversary.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/YMKOj1Ay8_E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c6e1f747-9d78-4c7a-a44e-d0e34b1f8c8e</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1109_halls_berlinwall.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Election Boycotts Don't Work</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/GlqO_fxbdhE/1103_afghanistan_frankel.aspx</link>
      <description>Matthew Frankel compares Abdullah Abdullah's withdrawal from Afghanistan's runoff election to other electoral boycotts over the years. Based on independent research of 100 boycotts since 1990, Frankel concludes that they rarely work and often fracture the party involved.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/GlqO_fxbdhE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">37e1f926-8ea4-4081-8483-5425638e1d1c</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1103_afghanistan_frankel.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Options in Afghanistan and the Karzai Brothers</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/9UskZ1mVimI/1102_afghanistan_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/K/KA KE/karzai003_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="U.S. Options in Afghanistan and the Karzai Brothers" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hamid Karzai was declared the winner of the presidential vote in Afghanistan on November 2 and he was quickly warned that he must crack down on rampant corruption. Vanda Felbab-Brown joined several other experts to discuss what should be done about President Karzai's brother, Wali Karzai, who has been linked to Afghanistan's narcotics trade.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/9UskZ1mVimI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">484dbca2-0929-43e4-ad0a-df94c9b996af</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1102_afghanistan_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>CNO Admiral Gary Roughead: The Future of Unmanned Naval Technologies</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/9IFnsaviSGE/1102_naval_technologies.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;November 02, 2009, 9:30 AM to 11:00 AM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;On November 2, the 21st Century Defense Initiative at Brookings hosted Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Gary Roughead. Admiral Roughead discussed the U.S. Navy’s use of new technologies, and its development and integration of unmanned systems into the current and future Navy force structure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/9IFnsaviSGE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6616bb5-63b1-4e92-aeeb-c8519f870c78</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/1102_naval_technologies.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Abdullah's Withdrawal from the Runoff Election in Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/6IOMMT5rOtk/1031_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AA AE/abdullah002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Abdullah's Withdrawal from the Runoff Election in Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Michael O'Hanlon discusses Abdullah Abdullah's withdrawal from Afghanistan's presidential election runoff that was scheduled for November 7. O'Hanlon argues that while Afghan President Karzai can now be viewed as legitimate, although tainted, he is hardly out of the woods.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/6IOMMT5rOtk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">09242acf-9da1-4376-9507-16573c878eda</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1031_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>A Revolution Once More: Unmanned Systems and the Middle East</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/WU-_cfvMJBk/11_robotic_revolution_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Amidst growing use of robotics in warfare, Peter Singer explores the future of unmanned systems in the Middle East and South Asia.  Singer concludes that while the United States remains -- and likely will remain -- the top developer of such technology, it is only a matter of time before other nations begin deploying robotics in large numbers.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/WU-_cfvMJBk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fdea8ddf-3594-4f6e-b828-ab4579c9ff5a</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/11_robotic_revolution_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Narco-belligerents Across the Globe: Lessons from Colombia for Afghanistan?</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/JO4eUbiWNuo/1028_counternarcotics_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>Increased insecurity in Afghanistan and the sense that the counterinsurgency is not being won have left many looking for comparisons that can shape future policy.  Vanda Felbab-Brown examines similarities between the counternarcotics and counterinsurgency efforts in Colombia to draw conclusions on how to reverse recent trends in Afghanistan.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/JO4eUbiWNuo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8ca387e4-67a8-45ba-86ee-8a7436a35b33</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/1028_counternarcotics_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Counternarcotics Strategy in Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/zHRNdK-CPhY/1021_counternarcotics_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/P/PJ PO/poppy001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="U.S. Counternarcotics Strategy in Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;In testimony before the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control, Vanda Felbab-Brown discussed how narcotics production influences the security, political, and economic developments in Afghanistan. Felbab-Brown also examined the effectiveness of policies to mitigate these effects and offered recommendations for the future of U.S. policy on the issue.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/zHRNdK-CPhY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e1a2fa2-a40d-4d52-bba0-5db9456ff4bc</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/testimony/2009/1021_counternarcotics_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Make American Resources Conditional on Afghan Progress</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/DQsDY7AB1ps/1019_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial"&gt;Congressional leaders and the Obama administration discussing "intermediate options" in Afghanistan, but could such an approach prove successful? Michael O’Hanlon and Stephen Solarz offer insight into what middle-ground steps General Stanley McChrystal is already taking and explain how an active U.S.-Afghan partnership is essential to providing security, safety and success in Afghanistan.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/DQsDY7AB1ps" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8493177a-48d5-4370-ba2b-8a84137d8e1b</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1019_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>A Response to Ken Lieberthal's Report on the Intelligence Community</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/QqS_4_IfELk/1019_intelligence_frankel.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/C/CJ CO/counterterrorism003_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="A Response to Ken Lieberthal's Report on the Intelligence Community" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brookings Federal Executive Fellow Matthew Frankel explores Ken Lieberthal's recent report, "The U.S. Intelligence Community and Foreign Policy: Getting Analysis Right." While Frankel argues the paper makes excellent points throughout, he examines several which he feels deserve rebuttal.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/QqS_4_IfELk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fb9c99c8-971a-4305-bcfa-7a44a561d848</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1019_intelligence_frankel.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>It's All or Nothing in Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/UYI0lIRrvkw/1012_afghanistan_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/U/UP UZ/us_soldiers003_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="It's All or Nothing in Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;As the Afghanistan strategy debate continues, Vanda Felbab-Brown says policymakers should not be fooled by options that lie “in the middle” of a beefed-up counterinsurgency mission and a scaled-back counterterrorism operation. Felbab-Brown believes the United States and NATO must decide how important the stakes are, and either properly resource the current mission or cut losses now rather than later.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/UYI0lIRrvkw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b0bee2a-a1f0-4d7b-b328-d4b77d5d6111</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1012_afghanistan_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Should President Obama Send More Troops to Afghanistan?</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/93ZIBrNdcWU/1011_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>Michael O'Hanlon joined Bob Shieffer, and guests on Face the Nation, to discuss the current and future U.S. strategy in Afghanistan. O'Hanlon focused on the growth of the Taliban as grounds to back additional troop increases for the counterinsurgency mission and argued the counterterrorism strategy advocated by some has already been tried and did not work.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/93ZIBrNdcWU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">29e27dc1-6d9c-4545-b8f6-f6bd89b26d1f</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/1011_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>States of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/bqLOh_LV75g/1007_afghanistan_iraq_pakistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/P/PA PE/pakistan_troops001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="States of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Iraq remains between peace and war while the situation in Afghanistan still appears to be deteriorating, and Pakistan is doing better than Afghanistan but more progress is needed.   Jason Campbell, Michael O'Hanlon and Jeremy Shapiro examine leading metrics from all three countries to assess how well the counterinsurgency and stabilization operations are faring.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/bqLOh_LV75g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5c3c0ccd-2c29-4c8a-bd34-92be2689a6f7</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1007_afghanistan_iraq_pakistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Scouting Report: Future U.S. Defense Needs in a High Technology Present</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/Tev4GX3yYZY/1007_defense_priorities_chat.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;October 07, 2009, 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;New technology and modes of warfare are changing our understanding of national security and defense capabilities. On Wednesday, October 7, Peter W. Singer and Fred Barbash answered questions about defense issues in a high-tech world, including: current U.S. defense needs; defense energy security; and future priorities such as robotic warfare on the ground, in the air and from space.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/Tev4GX3yYZY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b6da7b3-e64f-42d1-a876-14da0cbc1279</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/1007_defense_priorities_chat.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Gen. Stanley McChrystal: A General Within Bounds in Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/CCZRhR1OrTg/1006_mcchrystal_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/O/OA OE/obama_mcchrystal001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Gen. Stanley McChrystal: A General Within Bounds in Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has come under fire for making public comments about the war. Michael O'Hanlon writes that while McChrystal was indeed too blunt, the criticism goes too far because McChrystal critiqued an option – scaling back to a counterterrorism mission – directly at odds with the current policy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/CCZRhR1OrTg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7e85669e-6d0d-487b-ba51-00f761560b10</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1006_mcchrystal_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Measure the War in Afghanistan and Iraq</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/G847MEHv0BA/10_afghanistan_iraq_campbell.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/U/UP UZ/us_soldiers002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="How to Measure the War in Afghanistan and Iraq" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Correctly sizing the military force and tracking results on the ground are key to success in counterinsurgency and stabilization missions, write Jason Campbell, Michael O'Hanlon, and Jeremy Shapiro. To determine how the U.S. strategy is working, they assess a range of indicators to measure progress in Afghanistan and relate them to lessons learned from the conflict in Iraq.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/G847MEHv0BA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4cb6bf16-e17c-4098-bf6c-900eaff5814b</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/10_afghanistan_iraq_campbell.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>No Big Blank Checks for Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/o7bSCzB5R58/1001_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_army002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="No Big Blank Checks for Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Michael O'Hanlon says an apparent gap has emerged between the military leadership in Afghanistan and President Obama's advisers who have growing doubts about the mission there. Though additional troops may be needed, O'Hanlon believes it is it is sensible to tie a commitment of more resources to the Afghanistan government doing more and addressing corruption within their country.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/o7bSCzB5R58" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">afbd398d-9906-4913-9000-e60d005929d1</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/1001_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>A Good Idea For Dealing With African Pirates</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/iqLU4R-xA3A/0929_africa_pirates_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>The spring 2009 operation to rescue the captain of the Mersk Alabama did not end the problem of piracy and it was not a model for the future, writes Michael O’Hanlon. Instead, he believes a U.S. House idea to insert U.S. military personnel onto cargo ships for dangerous parts of the journey is a good one because they are well trained and can use force carefully.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/iqLU4R-xA3A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3b7d1470-2a9d-4e35-8a18-f8dd7f2a8c6b</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0929_africa_pirates_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Reducing Demand for Poppy Inside and Outside Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/_XZljQDLvOA/0925_afghanistan_counternarcotics_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_poppy003_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Reducing Demand for Poppy Inside and Outside Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Afghanistan's drug economy needs urgent attention, but it also needs a smart policy. Emphasizing rural development and legal livelihoods while interdicting drug traffickers and reducing demand worldwide are the best options, says Vanda Felbab-Brown.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/_XZljQDLvOA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2e4cf2f-6670-43f7-a239-2065949d2b2c</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0925_afghanistan_counternarcotics_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Obama Administration’s New Counternarcotics Strategy in Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/SzOFr424gaA/09_afghanistan_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/N/NA NE/narcotics_afghanistan001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="The Obama Administration’s New Counternarcotics Strategy in Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;As President Barack Obama considers alternatives to increasing the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, Vanda Felbab-Brown argues his administration's new counternarcotics policy represents a courageous break with previous misguided efforts there and thirty years of U.S. counternarcotics policies around the world.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/SzOFr424gaA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e289dc32-ba0d-4e36-af30-7e1e9d133b29</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/09_afghanistan_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We Can't Go Small In Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/FXXP0MIwdZQ/0924_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_canadian001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Why We Can't Go Small In Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;As questions about future military deployments to Afghanistan grow more numerous, Michael O'Hanlon and Bruce Riedel dissect the argument that the United States can again narrow the mission to only address counterterrorism. O'Hanlon and Riedel conclude the correct path remains the one outlined by President Obama in March, even though it may require more time and resources.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/FXXP0MIwdZQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">047ebddb-1def-4d12-8c83-c7226879656e</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0924_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Tie Troops to Progress on Afghanistan’s Corruption</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/vp_I1fbFggE/0923_afghanistan_metrics_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_voter002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Tie Troops to Progress on Afghanistan’s Corruption" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Michael O'Hanlon and Jane Harman write that the Afghanistan metrics delivered to Congress last week sorely understate the issue of government corruption. They conclude success in Afghanistan hinges on success of an anti-corruption effort and offer suggestions for both internal and external actors to address the problem.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/vp_I1fbFggE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bd25500a-1a63-4cff-a31e-7c9e7b6f55d0</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0923_afghanistan_metrics_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Light Fighter Planes: From Crop-Dusting to Counterinsurgency?</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/084i_Ood9Qs/0922_drones_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>The U.S. Air Force recently announced a plan to explore purchasing 100 "light fighters" for use in counterinsurgency operations in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.  Peter Singer explores why the Air Force should not follow through on this plan, and he argues that unmanned systems already developed are better options moving forward.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/084i_Ood9Qs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac4a2559-6248-471b-a776-81a6b2e88079</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0922_drones_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Fending Off Failure in Afghanistan: The Opium Factor</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/-RJ_b7_1ZFE/0921_afghanistan_opium_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_poppy002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Fending Off Failure in Afghanistan: The Opium Factor" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;A recent statement by Gen. Stanley McChrystal calling for a dramatic increase in troops on the ground in Afghanistan has sparked a new nationwide debate over U.S. strategy in the country.  Vanda Felbab-Brown contends increased resources will be vital to ensure success in the counterinsurgency operation, and she argues there is a critical link between security, counternarcotics and counterterrorism efforts.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/-RJ_b7_1ZFE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f7966cdb-94bd-4a13-a424-0d1e0bd93293</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0921_afghanistan_opium_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrain, Tribes, and Terrorists: Pakistan, 2006-2008</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/QlIpIRxHmmk/0910_pakistan_kilcullen.aspx</link>
      <description>Leading counterinsurgency expert David Kilcullen argues that Pakistani security forces have performed inadequately against insurgents in the frontier with Afghanistan because poor governance and societal weaknesses have been exacerbated by decades of violence and lawlessness. Heavy-handed military tactics by the army have resulted in a perpetuation of violence, and have only further undermined local governance. A fundamental rethink of Pakistan’s political strategy is therefore necessary.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/QlIpIRxHmmk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42354e4d-275c-4685-b3c8-338aceb7eed7</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/0910_pakistan_kilcullen.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>UN Says Afghan Opium Production Down</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/oQo3c6tSLc0/0902_afghanistan_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>According to a new United Nations report, Opium cultivation is down 22 percent in Afghanistan. Vanda Felbab-Brown joined National Public Radio to discuss why the significance of these numbers should not be overestimated and to offer insight into the new counternarcotics strategy in Afghanistan.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/oQo3c6tSLc0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d811a62c-cc31-4101-b7fe-09fb5235b918</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0902_afghanistan_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>What's Right With Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/fL7ihRH2iAY/0902_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_family001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="What's Right With Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;As support for the war in Afghanistan continues to fall, Michael O'Hanlon and Bruce Riedel examine the positive aspects of the mission there. They argue that state building is an inherently slow process while concluding the largely pro-American Afghan people want to succeed and noting police and military forces are becoming more able.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/fL7ihRH2iAY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8fbe7409-8043-488f-9d86-5f0b8ffab47e</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0902_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Afghanistan: Measuring Progress Toward Peace</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/_GZ7liZs5Sc/0901_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_police003_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Afghanistan: Measuring Progress Toward Peace" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Following the important August 20 elections in Afghanistan, Michael O'Hanlon and Bruce Riedel write that this is likely the final fresh start for the U.S. and NATO. With support for the war falling at home and abroad, they explore how progress should be quantified in Afghanistan and urge patience regarding the mission there.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/_GZ7liZs5Sc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9fa859bf-f07a-4b21-bd3a-fac4170979a5</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0901_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Wired for War: The Future of Military Robots</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/qbRSf5sS2Go/0828_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Though robots are currently being used by the U.S. military in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere, Peter Singer says this is just the beginning and much more advanced types are coming. In an extract from his book &lt;em&gt;Wired for War&lt;/em&gt;, Singer examines the future of robotic warfare on the ground, in the air and from space.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/qbRSf5sS2Go" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f88b6723-1286-4f46-bd88-c4beead7b46a</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0828_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Fueling the "Balance": A Defense Energy Strategy Primer</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/c5200rFz5OE/08_defense_strategy_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/S/SJ SO/solar_panels007_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Fueling the "Balance": A Defense Energy Strategy Primer" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;The U.S. Department of Defense is the world’s single largest consumer of energy, using more resources than 100 nations. Peter Singer and Jerry Warner analyze what can be done to better manage defense energy security by implementing steps to increase energy efficiency and substituting alternative forms of energy to meet the military’s fuel needs.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/c5200rFz5OE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">747bcf9b-0c85-4898-8529-3dd2cb6394b3</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/08_defense_strategy_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Fueling Our Security: The Need for a Defense Energy Strategy</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/Y53QXpyY-iM/0825_defense_energy_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer believes the issue of energy security has too long been looked at through only the environmental lens. He argues that it is also a national security issue, noting the U.S. military spends roughly $20 billion a year for petroleum alone, that diverts funds which would be better served elsewhere.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/Y53QXpyY-iM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2048e172-67b1-442a-b75c-a9ff8551e8bd</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0825_defense_energy_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Afghanistan's Elections and Accountable Governance</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/Q5SL2q_Rr-Q/0819_afghanistan_elections_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_election002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Afghanistan's Elections and Accountable Governance" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;The August 20 elections in Afghanistan represent a crucial opportunity to give Afghans a sense of at least some control over their future. Vanda Felbab-Brown examines the leading candidates and argues the international community needs to make it clear to the next Afghan president that assistance is conditioned on improved and accountable governance.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/Q5SL2q_Rr-Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a328978c-5340-40d2-810b-dc829f14d897</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0819_afghanistan_elections_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Boots On Congo Ground</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/_Jws7MlxZak/0814_congo_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>Since the early 1990s, Congo has been on a rapid descent as Genocide in Rwanda spilled over the border and other internal human rights issues worsen. Michael O'Hanlon writes that the United States needs to lead by example and plan to deploy a specialized volunteer force of U.S. military peacekeeping monitors to strengthen the security of the nation.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/_Jws7MlxZak" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5080ca56-86fb-41ea-bc75-d256784111c8</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0814_congo_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The 2009 Afghanistan Elections and the Future of Governance</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/IKDMsiAql4k/0813_afghanistan_elections_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_soldier001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="The 2009 Afghanistan Elections and the Future of Governance" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vanda Felbab-Brown believes the August 20 Afghanistan elections represent a test for at least three critical issues in that country – accountability, military strength and governance. Felbab-Brown argues that ushering in more effective and responsible governance is critical, and she concludes it must be built by Afghan hands rather than forced by international actors.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/IKDMsiAql4k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">32e0fffa-2b12-4ae4-b574-097658ded860</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0813_afghanistan_elections_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Barack Obama, Kevin Rudd and the Australia-U.S. Alliance</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/r2EEhvQaFM8/08_america_australia_fullilove.aspx</link>
      <description>Over the past decade, much of the commentary on the Australia-U.S. alliance has focused on how the conservative leaders of both nations formulated policy. Michael Fullilove and Michael O'Hanlon analyze the developing relationship between Democratic President Barack Obama and Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and how it may reshape the alliance.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/r2EEhvQaFM8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2f0417a-53a0-4f79-8da7-1aadccebde6c</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/08_america_australia_fullilove.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>President Obama in Mexico</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/Icv2cQuHnq4/0810_mexico_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/O/OA OE/obama_pascual001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="President Obama in Mexico" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vanda Felbab-Brown joined Diane Rehm to discuss President Obama's meeting in Guadalajara with leaders of Canada and Mexico on issues of mutual concern including escalating drug violence in Mexico, immigration and the economy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/Icv2cQuHnq4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">edad5810-a323-4aac-84dc-e4b4f42bc97c</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0810_mexico_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama off to a Good Start on Security Issues</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/QlW4Tg8nymY/0804_foreign_policy_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>Michael O'Hanlon assesses Barack Obama's foreign policy record halfway through his first year as president. From Russia to China and India, O'Hanlon concludes that Obama is handling situations about as well as possible. In Iraq and Afghanistan, O’Hanlon believes Obama has been willing to take important advice from commanders on the ground as well as&amp;nbsp;Secretary Gates to make tough but well executed decisions.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/QlW4Tg8nymY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf8f0d1f-366e-423c-8acd-703160a0a76e</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0804_foreign_policy_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Are Chinese Aircraft Carriers a Threat? </title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/vt6wjpXEhwI/0728_china_military_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>In addition to an aircraft carrier purchased from Russia, China is reportedly planning to add four more to its fleet by 2020. Peter Singer analyzes the future of China's sea power projection and argues that U.S. defense planning should focus on shorter-term concerns ranging from Chinese hackers accessing sensitive material to anti-ship ballistic missiles capable of hitting targets 1,500 miles away.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/vt6wjpXEhwI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2901827e-e311-46d7-b0f5-91279be36b6f</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0728_china_military_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Iraq's Northern Problem</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/Itl71CmqtJI/0721_iraq_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/K/KP KZ/kurdistan_soldiers001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Iraq's Northern Problem" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Michael O'Hanlon says that Iraq is going well on the whole, but there could be trouble brewing between the Iraqi army and Kurdish peshmerga over land interests. To address the situation, O'Hanlon recommends a U.S. envoy to Iraq be named, Kirkuk to be supervised internationally and negotiations of new "green lines" for the Kurdistan border.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/Itl71CmqtJI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87ccae3f-ad45-4ebe-ab1a-f38eebbe67fe</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0721_iraq_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Target the Drug Lords in Afghanistan, Not the Farmers</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/xN-stcd27RM/0715_counternarcotics_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghan_poppy001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Target the Drug Lords in Afghanistan, Not the Farmers" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vanda Felbab-Brown writes that the new U.S. counternarcotics strategy in Afghanistan represents a courageous and welcome shift in American policy.&amp;nbsp;Felbab-Brown believes focusing on legal alternatives for farmers and emphasizing rural development will breed success in reducing illicit economies&amp;nbsp;as well as&amp;nbsp;bolster the larger counterinsurgency operation.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/xN-stcd27RM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9730f0e9-1cc3-4cfc-a83d-037477ef3dde</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0715_counternarcotics_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Mastering Counterinsurgency: A Workshop Report</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/H-iSKHD-3wQ/0707_counterinsurgency_cohen.aspx</link>
      <description>In early May, the Pakistan army launched its biggest-ever counterinsurgency operation in Swat. Only two months earlier, the Brookings Institution, with support from the National Defense University and the Government of Pakistan, held a three-day workshop exploring American and Pakistani approaches to counterinsurgency and low intensity conflict. Stephen Cohen and Shuja Nawaz provide an overview of the topics discussed, in the context of the current situation in Pakistan.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/H-iSKHD-3wQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9acbfed-83e9-4b08-82a0-2e473cc59f30</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/0707_counterinsurgency_cohen.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>We Might Still Need More Troops In Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/BpYOvLLQM8M/0707_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghanistan_patrol001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="We Might Still Need More Troops In Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;For all its virtues, the new plan in Afghanistan may still lowball requirements for the mission to succeed, writes Michael O'Hanlon. He believes that, at the very least, the Obama administration should leave the option of upping the troop commitment on the table should the need arise.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/BpYOvLLQM8M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">72d93c87-7f33-471f-8e6d-e771e98376ef</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0707_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Tactical Generals: Leaders, Technology, and the Perils</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/x_5qTllEe48/summer_military_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/S/SA SE/sarkozy_military001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Tactical Generals: Leaders, Technology, and the Perils" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;General Charles Krulak coined the term “strategic corporal” (a junior member trained to make time-critical decisions in response to the dynamic ground fight). Peter Singer examines a similar phenomenon occurring among senior officers, observing that modern technology allows generals to personally engage on the tactical level from remote locations.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/x_5qTllEe48" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">772d9e7a-76c6-493c-85a8-f78016f0b1e0</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/summer_military_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Afghanistan Is No Iraq</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/ZcQ9zmiKOVk/0706_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>Though there are parallels between Iraq and Afghanistan, says Michael O’Hanlon, Afghanistan’s history of war makes the Afghan people realistic in their expectations about the future—and grateful for even modest progress.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/ZcQ9zmiKOVk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">718de827-c001-441d-b083-7c3cd9c51171</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0706_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Building A Basis For Success in Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/d23xolpkKio/0701_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>While many of the military objectives have been determined in Afghanistan, Michael O'Hanlon believes there are many crucial decisions ahead regarding economic matters. O'Hanlon explores options ranging from increased foreign aid to developing free-trade agreements, and he offers suggestions for the challenges ahead.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/d23xolpkKio" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5fe34d4d-9189-443a-afbf-277f314a0784</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0701_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Our Dangerous Defense Policy Addiction</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/YaW4qM6yvSI/0630_defense_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer writes that the United States is a nation of thinking big, but he cautions against continuing to translate this interest to national security and defense policy. Singer believes the Pentagon should encourage more competition to create leaner, cheaper and less time-draining weapons systems and vehicles.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/YaW4qM6yvSI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50e6cebe-0e9e-4bf0-86f9-41875b36fc0f</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0630_defense_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Attack of the Military Drones</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/FqdpKvCp4uU/0627_drones_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>In modern warfare, precision drones can dramatically reduce human casualties. Peter Singer explores the debate surrounding this mechanization of warfare and exposes the battle of ideas—both for and against military robotics use—that it has sparked.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/FqdpKvCp4uU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1730616d-9b47-4177-9b79-e8cb0f95dc74</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0627_drones_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Applying Counterinsurgency Principles in Pakistan’s Frontier</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/aAXRzIWOZ18/0625_counterinsurgency_white.aspx</link>
      <description>A dictum of counterinsurgency theory is that no two insurgencies are exactly alike. The conflict underway in Pakistan’s northwest frontier, in many respects, bears little resemblance to the wars that have been fought by U.S.-led forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Joshua T. White takes the basic principles learned from the American counterinsurgency experience, and analyzes how each of those principles may be applicable to the frontier context, while also providing recommendations for first steps that can be taken by the Pakistani military, in conjunction with the U.S. government.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/aAXRzIWOZ18" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dffcaa4e-ad47-42ad-8ca1-0a0ee3ef69f9</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/0625_counterinsurgency_white.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The States of Iraq and Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/5MnMux2bkKY/0618_afghanistan_iraq_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghanistan_development001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="The States of Iraq and Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;The American troop buildup is proceeding in Afghanistan while Iraq—despite several recent attacks—continues to slowly progress on many fronts. Jason Campbell, Michael O'Hanlon and Jeremy Shapiro examine leading metrics from both conflicts to assess how well the counterinsurgency operations are going.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/5MnMux2bkKY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">92243661-6d15-4940-80da-97a0a4e8b20f</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0618_afghanistan_iraq_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rise of the Tactical General</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/9iH-Lr21SR8/06_unmanned_systems_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/R/RJ RO/robotics_baghdad001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="The Rise of the Tactical General" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peter Singer frames the ongoing robotics revolution within militaries around the world through the idea of the tactical general who—given the ability through unmanned systems—can micromanage even the lowest-level operations. Singer believes that even though the capabilities in war are changing, lessons of the past should guide military leaders who are tempted to stray from their job of setting broad goals and battlefield objectives.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/9iH-Lr21SR8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd97ab43-0814-48cf-a453-911e0099ac5c</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/06_unmanned_systems_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Obama Administration's Sound Thinking On Missile Defense</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/VzRfLAYTF7A/0609_missile_defense_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>A central critique of the Obama administration’s new defense budget proposal is that it underfunds missile defense systems. Given how far the systems have progressed over the years, Michael O'Hanlon argues the critique is overblown and examines the relatively minor cuts to the program.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/VzRfLAYTF7A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2278d64b-453c-447d-9970-52cbceeadae3</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0609_missile_defense_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Principles of Modern American Counterinsurgency: Evolution and Debate</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/8Sdc_PuaZSM/0608_counterinsurgency_davidson.aspx</link>
      <description>The United States has a long but convoluted history of counterinsurgency, or COIN. Janine Davidson outlines the American experience with insurgency, describes the basic principles of successful COIN operations, and provides a glossary of the often confusing and controversial terminology used by the U.S. military and government in the context of non-traditional military operations.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/8Sdc_PuaZSM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a6e76f58-015c-4ecb-aec7-61dfebd7a2bd</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/0608_counterinsurgency_davidson.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Damning Paradox of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/FfOrof_7Onw/0602_military_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" forces soldiers to lie about or hide their sexual orientation to keep from being discharged. Peter Singer believes it is time for President Obama to fulfill his campaign pledge to end the policy so that patriotic and capable military members can focus on national security instead social politics.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/FfOrof_7Onw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e47005be-7335-430e-942b-41e12aa27bd6</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0602_military_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Gaming the Robot Revolution</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/74Y_YuKLPZ0/0522_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer examines the growing military robotics industry in light of the &lt;i&gt;Terminator: Salvation&lt;/i&gt; and&amp;nbsp;thoughts that robots may someday turn on their human creators. Singer concludes that while many of our inventions come from science fiction, we already have become so reliant on technology that we should not worry about a takeover.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/74Y_YuKLPZ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b98a442-5549-4fed-96c7-d7973e8cf554</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0522_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Isaac Asimov's Laws of Robotics Are Wrong</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/CZ0Ht0CkXQo/0518_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>When people talk about robots and ethics, they always seem to bring up Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics." But Peter Singer argues there are major problems with these laws and their use in our real world. Singer believes that instead of focusing on the morality of the robots themselves, we should examine the ethics of those behind the machines.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/CZ0Ht0CkXQo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2105fddb-f083-409b-8bbd-1106118f3cb8</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0518_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Future of Global Engagement: A Discussion with Adm. Michael G. Mullen</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/2eEmXwpuKG8/0518_global_engagement.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;May 18, 2009, 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;On May 18, the 21st Century Defense Initiative at Brookings&amp;nbsp;hosted Admiral Michael G. Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Admiral Mullen discussed the nature of global military engagements over the next decade and how our national security institutions should assess the future spectrum of threats in order to properly organize, resource and respond.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/2eEmXwpuKG8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d47e9bde-8140-4d07-9c79-f6f844e10028</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/0518_global_engagement.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>A Defense Force of Terminators is Almost Here</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/SbVTJSCzF0w/0511_robots_war_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer addresses a recent Australian white paper envisioning a military force for 2030. Noting that the white paper places very little emphasis on military robotics, Singer writes, “in planning for the future, we should not ignore the technological trends that are already in action.”&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/SbVTJSCzF0w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">808cd78a-ec2a-4f0f-b653-466bed4cff7c</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0511_robots_war_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Pakistan's Nuclear Scenarios: The Risks with Bombing</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/VK8dlN4dFUM/0506_pakistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>As the Pakistani military launched a new offensive against the Taliban in the country’s North-West Frontier Province, officials and former officials in Washington continued to discuss what the American response should be to the heightened conflict. Michael O'Hanlon offers his views on the situation.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/VK8dlN4dFUM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bc46d26a-3fc8-4604-8e21-70ea94692303</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0506_pakistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Reasons to Love Washington (D.C.): We're Inventing the Future</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/pwlXHoKqvik/05_technology_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer explains why the Washington, D.C.&amp;nbsp;area can be compared to a science fiction laboratory where the future of technology is created.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/pwlXHoKqvik" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47e3b773-4cd7-4b7c-bed9-30c96470e058</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/05_technology_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Air Force's Role in Irregular Warfare and Counterinsurgency</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/AJNSG8Z9EyE/0424_air_force.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;April 24, 2009, 10:00 AM to 11:15 AM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/air_force001_fs.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;On April 24, the 21st Century Defense Initiative at Brookings hosted General Norton A. Schwartz, chief of staff of the United States Air Force, for a discussion of the Air Force’s strategic and operational role in conducting irregular warfare and counterinsurgency operations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/AJNSG8Z9EyE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">94738597-5045-4797-9d48-857dcc7803ca</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/0424_air_force.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment of the Implementation of the United States Government's Support for Plan Colombia's Illicit Crop Reduction Components</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/KTwAj_fz8xg/0417_plan_colombia_felbabbrown.aspx</link>
      <description>Vanda Felbab-Brown and several other authors produced a report evaluating Plan Columbia for review by the United States Agency for Development. The study provides an assessment of the success of counternarcotics strategies to date and offers recommendations for the U.S. government to strengthen future efforts.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/KTwAj_fz8xg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a6385c0-fec9-470a-b271-154336788b83</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2009/0417_plan_colombia_felbabbrown.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tighter Command Is Needed in Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/DI1T_-t8xUM/0410_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>Michael O'Hanlon and Ömer Taşpınar write that the Obama administration's plan for Afghanistan and Pakistan is generally strong, but it also requires improvement. Most importantly, O'Hanlon and Taşpınar believe command arrangements need to be strengthened, based on the three-person Iraq model and broadened to include a foreign leader like Turkey's foreign minister Hikmet Cetin.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/DI1T_-t8xUM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a905196f-cdc1-4d2b-838a-dc87d11cd4cb</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0410_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Budgeting for Hard Power : Defense and Security Spending Under Barack Obama</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/3srH9a0cWbU/budgetingforhardpower.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Press/Books/2009/budgetingforhardpower/budgetingforhardpower.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=79&amp;mw=53" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;This timely book is the worthy successor to previous Brookings volumes on defense spending, including most recently O'Hanlon's  &lt;I&gt;Defense Strategy for the Post-Saddam Era&lt;/I&gt; (2005) and  &lt;I&gt;Defense Policy Choices for the Bush Administration&lt;/I&gt; (2001 and 2002). It continues our
proud tradition of nonpartisan empirical analysis of defense issues.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/3srH9a0cWbU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">039c8f08-5cce-45e9-ad57-2a937c12c597</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/press/Books/2009/budgetingforhardpower.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The 3 Laws May Not Be Enough To Guide Robot Warriors</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/o0YGjXgxzWA/0401_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>What does the Pentagon think about a possible robot uprising? Is Star Trek's view of combat realistic? Peter Singer addresses these questions and others in an interview with io9 about his new book, &lt;i&gt;Wired for War&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/o0YGjXgxzWA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5703a18a-a66f-4dc2-bb0d-24dfd01112d8</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0401_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>No-Drama Obama and the North Koreans</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/r636yeoMvTg/0401_north_korea_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/J/JA JE/japan_soldier001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="No-Drama Obama and the North Koreans" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some analysts&amp;nbsp;suggested a strong U.S. response was in order to&amp;nbsp;North Korea's&amp;nbsp;long-range rocket test. Michael O'Hanlon argued that the Obama administration should instead be patient and use this as an opportunity for cooperation with an international coalition to secure longer-term goals.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/r636yeoMvTg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a9b8ee20-5bbe-474b-a8d7-55114031e3ed</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0401_north_korea_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Grading Obama's Afghanistan Strategy</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/BVfPln8_SNw/0327_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>While Michael O'Hanlon generally supports the new Afghanistan strategy set forth by the Obama administration, he feels it can still be improved and offers suggestions to do so.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/BVfPln8_SNw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fe800348-bb3f-46a6-833a-870498f0c2f1</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0327_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>FM 3-07 Stability Operations: A Comprehensive Approach to the 21st Century</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/0pst8_-L_vw/0327_stability.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;March 27, 2009, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/S/SJ SO/soldier_002_fs.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;On March 27, the 21st Century Defense Initiative at Brookings&amp;nbsp;hosted the launch of the latest version of the Army Field Manual, FM 3-07 Stability Operations. The latest Army doctrine, FM 3-07, underscores a recognition that the U.S. military will increasingly be called upon to help bring peace and order to societies under stress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/0pst8_-L_vw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">947b67af-8cd3-431f-aa18-97ebe2f525ae</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/0327_stability.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>An Exit Strategy is a Must-Have for Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/-1-CB6CbSbE/0325_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghanistan_soldiers002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="An Exit Strategy is a Must-Have for Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Obama has recently stated that any new approach in Afghanistan will require an exit strategy from the get-go. Michael O'Hanlon believes the U.S. can have both a success strategy and an exit strategy at once, writing that we must work with our NATO allies and plan on handing over responsibility to U.S.-trained Afghan security forces slowly over the course of several years.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/-1-CB6CbSbE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eaf4c6a1-eb0a-4077-9a32-2a2989c54a02</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0325_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Toward Reconciliation in Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/Gmlgx6QIg1s/04_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/afghanistan_election001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Toward Reconciliation in Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;The United States is committed to Afghanistan and over the course of 2009 will roughly double its troop strength there. Michael O'Hanlon analyzes the prospects for further development of the security sector and what will need to be accomplished for political reconciliation in Afghanistan.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/Gmlgx6QIg1s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8dc6ee02-91f9-4364-a490-6131a23e97da</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/04_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The States of Iraq and Afghanistan</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/JItGcSCB6Ts/0320_iraq_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/I/IP IZ/iraq_children007_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="The States of Iraq and Afghanistan" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;As President Obama looks to reduce the number of troops in Iraq, the situation in Afghanistan is increasingly cloudy. Jason Campbell, Michael O'Hanlon and Jeremy Shapiro examine leading indicators of progress—or lack thereof—in both countries.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/JItGcSCB6Ts" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">524be71c-3393-443c-b7c6-1bd79ef94780</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0320_iraq_afghanistan_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Robot Wars Have Arrived</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/wDsmJvb9eCE/0312_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Just as the computer and ARPAnet evolved into the PC and Internet, robots are poised to integrate into everyday life in ways we can't even imagine, thanks in large part to research funded by the U.S. military. Peter Singer discussed his new book, &lt;i&gt;Wired for War&lt;/i&gt; with CNET, and explored the future of U.S. war fighting tactics.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/wDsmJvb9eCE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5399389d-0c53-4389-8d47-8146ae605d45</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0312_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Admiral Gary Roughead, Chief of Naval Operations, on the Future of Unmanned Naval Technologies</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/rNzH5qQKfYQ/0312_naval_technologies.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;March 12, 2009, 2:30 PM to 4:00 PM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;On March 12, the 21st Century Defense Initiative at Brookings will host Admiral Gary Roughead, Chief of Naval Operations, for a discussion on the U.S. Navy’s use of new technologies, and its development and integration of unmanned systems into the current and future Navy force structure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/rNzH5qQKfYQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b6143662-bee1-4c1f-a7c6-460923b4d363</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/0312_naval_technologies.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Robots and the Rise of "Tactical Generals"</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/h_Z6ynz6M9w/0309_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer explores the most amazing robotics revolution taking place in the history of war, and even perhaps of humanity.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/h_Z6ynz6M9w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f25d050d-23c4-4218-84b2-017fc0b803d8</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/0309_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Warfare Balance Sheet</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/rAOpfQQjmPs/0306_war_budget_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>Michael O'Hanlon explores defense spending in Afghanistan, Iraq and&amp;nbsp;other locations&amp;nbsp;in the world where U.S. military personnel are based. O'Hanlon finds that changes planned by the Obama administration will save large amounts of money over the coming years, but he cautions that politics of defense will continue to make it difficult to deny funding which supports troops in the field.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/rAOpfQQjmPs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f61e15b7-6408-4780-9c78-a99579320331</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0306_war_budget_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The U.S. Military's New Warriors: Robots</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/qsz23lmodVI/0305_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter W. Singer discusses advances in the use of robots by the U.S. military and the ethical concerns they raise.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/qsz23lmodVI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:32:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4d8c0295-b0cb-4d6d-ad3e-bcf8728ec9f3</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/multimedia/video/2009/0305_robots_singer.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>War as Entertainment?</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/NxAAozM_uy8/02_war_entertainment_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer joined bigthink.com to explore if force is used more liberally when humans are removed from the battlefield and replaced by robotics.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/NxAAozM_uy8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e89f43b0-1a92-416b-891a-dc907e8e8f4d</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/02_war_entertainment_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Resources for "Hard Power": The 2010 Budget for Defense, Homeland Security, and Related Programs</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/YrVNmn_G0cE/02_national_security_budget_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/H/HJ HO/homeland_security001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Resources for "Hard Power": The 2010 Budget for Defense, Homeland Security, and Related Programs" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;These are extraordinary times in American national security policy. The nation remains involved in two of the longest conflicts of its history in Iraq and Afghanistan, with more than 4,000 lives lost over six years in Iraq and more than 600 lost over nearly eight years in Afghanistan. In this Foreign Policy Working paper Michael O'Hanlon examines the multi-facted "hard power" budget options moving forward.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/YrVNmn_G0cE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eab247d0-224f-4a46-a2bf-a643718c9e57</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/02_national_security_budget_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Wired for War? Robots and Military Doctrine</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/th4xonzBhK0/winter_wired_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>The growth in of unmanned systems by the U.S. military has taken place so rapidly that we often forget how far we have come in just a short time. Peter Singer analyzes these changes in warfare and what it means for the future.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/th4xonzBhK0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2636ccc-a98b-43b9-97f4-e8ef4a6b2814</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/winter_wired_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>@ Brookings Podcast: Examining Long-term Fiscal Challenges; Waging War with Robots</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/mWqfRALzGRs/0213_at_brookings_podcast.aspx</link>
      <description>In this episode of @ Brookings, Brookings budget and governance experts&amp;nbsp;discuss&amp;nbsp;the budget deficit and long-term fiscal challenges facing the United States.&amp;nbsp;And Peter W. Singer discusses the amazing advances in robots built for war and the troubling ethical concerns they raise.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/mWqfRALzGRs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee0e00f8-0faf-48e7-8cad-e2eaeb429024</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/multimedia/video/2009/0213_at_brookings_podcast.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Military Robots and the Laws of War</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/7ZlCdcjch6U/winter_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer explores how unmanned systems are rapidly transforming armed conflict and how the U.S. military fights wars.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/7ZlCdcjch6U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c405f7ac-5461-4c76-b16e-a31b4abf93eb</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/winter_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside the Rise of the Warbots</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/IQSF6-Mqs2o/0204_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer's &lt;i&gt;Wired for War&lt;/i&gt; has been praised by everyone from former National Security Advisor Anthony Lake to Jon Stewart as a definitive look at the growing use of robots on the battlefield. Wired.com interviewed Singer about the rise of the machines.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/IQSF6-Mqs2o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b35f07b-0fea-45ce-a7e0-f6acd2206c1a</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0204_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Wired for War: American Killing Machines</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/RQUoFjoCNR4/0130_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/P/PP PZ/predator001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Wired for War: American Killing Machines" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;As science fiction becomes reality on our battlefields, America has a new corps of warriors fighting on its behalf. Peter Singer examines the robotic revolution now&amp;nbsp;underway in the U.S. military and how it may shape the future of war.&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/RQUoFjoCNR4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a9ce6b23-c33c-4e67-bcfe-90a8df9bb708</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0130_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Future of Robotics at War</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/sfLyoWhU5U4/0129_wired_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/R/RJ RO/robot002_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="The Future of Robotics at War" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the United States invaded Iraq, there were only a handful of aerial drones and no&amp;nbsp;unmanned ground systems. Today there are thousands of each, and the technology continues to improve. Brookings Senior Fellow Peter Singer joined Jon Stewart to discuss this technological revolution&amp;nbsp;in light of&amp;nbsp;his new book &lt;i&gt;Wired for War&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/sfLyoWhU5U4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd80c3cc-e27b-47f6-a95e-077a147fa3f7</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0129_wired_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Military 2.0: Should You Fear the Killer Robots?</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/hqjbMIgmkLg/0129_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>In his new book, &lt;i&gt;Wired for War&lt;/i&gt;, Peter Singer takes an in-depth and at times frightening look at the growing use of robotics by the military—a development that he argues will be looked on as "something revolutionary in war, maybe even in human history." Singer spoke with Mother Jones about the unforeseen ripple effects of these new technologies, the folly of calls to use robots in Darfur, and whether we should ban these machines before it's too late.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/hqjbMIgmkLg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f3937ca-329c-43fe-a7a9-34fa820f12c5</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0129_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>In the Loop? Armed Robots and the Future of War</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/aMFPzqtcZ5g/0128_robots_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>As the next generation of unmanned vehicles, ships, and planes hits the battlefield, Peter Singer explores the ramifications of the new battlefield reality involving robots at war.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/aMFPzqtcZ5g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">afdb41a4-0f02-42df-97eb-792e6faefe45</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/0128_robots_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Prepare for the Robot Wars</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/cp82sNwrOa0/0127_robot_war_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>In his latest work, Wired for War, Peter Singer confesses his passion for science fiction as he introduces us to a glimpse of things to come–the new technologies that will shape wars of the future. In this interview with Scott Horton, Singer discusses the future of military technology.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/cp82sNwrOa0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fbb2e045-acc4-4452-b357-a392ccefd752</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0127_robot_war_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Homeland Security Agenda for the Obama Administration</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/pZKE1EmYEdk/0126_homeland_security_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>Though substantial progress was made on the homeland security front by the Bush administration, Michael O'Hanlon writes that the list of vulnerabilities is still very long. Targets are numerous, but O'Hanlon notes many are hard to protect and preventing catastrophic attacks should be the primary goal.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/pZKE1EmYEdk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">90e3ca35-ada0-414e-b779-03849419dd0f</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0126_homeland_security_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/uFo5yq9H9iw/0126_wired.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;January 26, 2009, 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/A/AF AI/air_force_robot001_fs.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brookings&amp;nbsp;hosted&amp;nbsp;the launch of &lt;i&gt;Wired for War&lt;/i&gt;, a new book by&amp;nbsp;Peter W. Singer, who&amp;nbsp;discussed the ways in which robotics have and will change the face of war, as well as the larger implications of these revolutionary developments. Following Singer’s presentation, General James Mattis, USMC, joined the discussion of the issues surrounding war, politics and technology in the 21st century.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/uFo5yq9H9iw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20de8e3e-9502-4baf-9e47-50ef6e69c4f5</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/0126_wired.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Robots at War: The New Battlefield</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/H_LLji2r8IA/01_robots_at_war_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;span class="text85"&gt;It sounds like science fic&amp;shy;tion, but it is fact: On the battlefields of Iraq and Afghan&amp;shy;istan, robots are killing America’s ene&amp;shy;mies and sav&amp;shy;ing Ameri&amp;shy;can lives. But today’s Pack&amp;shy;Bots, Preda&amp;shy;tors, and Ravens are rela&amp;shy;tively prim&amp;shy;itive machines. Peter Singer says the coming generation of “war-bots” will be im&amp;shy;mensely more sophisti&amp;shy;cated, but their devel&amp;shy;op&amp;shy;ment raises troubling new questions about how and when we wage &amp;shy;war.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/H_LLji2r8IA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23e35fd9-640d-454e-bb39-d86a8faad257</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/01_robots_at_war_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>"Wired for War" Explores Robots on the Battlefield</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/qWbfyFQaH58/0122_wired_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Robot soldiers are no longer just the stuff of sci-fi fantasy. As Peter&amp;nbsp;Singer explains, some military tasks previously assigned to humans are now being handled by machines.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/qWbfyFQaH58" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b9766e1e-cb8b-49a6-b1d4-d6454f0fedea</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/interviews/2009/0122_wired_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Wired for War? Robots and Military Doctrine</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/HVR-07WN0mg/01_wired_for_war_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>Peter Singer writes that&amp;nbsp;it is clear that the American military must begin to think about the consequences of a 21st-century battlefield in which it is sending out fewer humans and more robots. Just as the technologies and modes of wars are changing, he argues, so must our concepts of how to fight and win them.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/HVR-07WN0mg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aa650ef7-f2bc-49cd-9bc5-5e819ffe03d4</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2009/01_wired_for_war_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Economics of a Chinese Currency Attack</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/7TJVaRY_xf8/12_currency_attack_haymond.aspx</link>
      <description>2007-2008 Federal Executive Fellow Jeffrey Haymond writes that the probability a currency attack on the dollar is low but plausible and potentially devastating. Haymond addresses how such an attack might be carried out and what can be done to prevent it.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/7TJVaRY_xf8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">474c57c4-1e7b-4933-97a5-f718fc7faa1d</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2008/12_currency_attack_haymond.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Sunni and Shi ’a Terrorism: Differences that Matter</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/9PHJmvi3d1Y/1229_terrorism_lynch.aspx</link>
      <description>There are significant and little appreciated differences in the trajectory of Sunni extremist terrorism and that of Shi’a extremism. 2007-2008 Federal Executive Fellow Thomas F. Lynch explores the differences that exist across six key areas that impact American policy considerations, especially in light of steadily escalating tensions with Iran.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/9PHJmvi3d1Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">633b63a2-b4f2-4dff-85db-26707abccbcb</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2008/1229_terrorism_lynch.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The 4 Percent Defense Spending Chimera</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/9jjKRBq5QV0/1111_defense_ohanlon.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/G/GA GE/gates_mullen001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="The 4 Percent Defense Spending Chimera" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;As U.S. armed forces continue their heroic operations around the globe, worries have intensified about sustaining adequate defense funding in the future. Michael O'Hanlon agues that a 4 percent gross domestic product floor for defense spending is unnecessary, because needs will fluctuate and there should not be a law preventing lower spending in the future if the geopolitical environment allows.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/9jjKRBq5QV0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb2a432a-d6d6-46a1-9550-df407344e933</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2008/1111_defense_ohanlon.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The Impact of Tomorrow’s Security Challenges on U.S. Northern Command</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/v2HMpgPlUiM/1024_northcom.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;October 24, 2008, 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/R/RA RE/renuart001_fs.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 21st Century Defense Initiative at Brookings hosted Gen. Victor E. Renuart, commander of the North American Aerospace Command and U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM), for a discussion of the impact of today's security challenges on the mission and structure of NORTHCOM.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/v2HMpgPlUiM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9f542e65-e963-4f09-b38e-d46781672bb6</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2008/1024_northcom.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Balancing the Force: Considerations of Size, Structure and Risk</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/BMt-oajIpaY/1022_military.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;October 22, 2008, 12:00 PM to 1:30 PM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;On October 22, the 21st Century Defense Initiative held a lunch and discussion with Nelson Ford, undersecretary of the Army. He offered his perspective on the challenges of resourcing the current mission of his service and how the Army’s current structure and size affects the U.S. ability to meet future security needs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/BMt-oajIpaY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9d447b8d-c543-4d3d-af7e-ff352c3aa4af</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2008/1022_military.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>How The Real World Ended “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/3rtTp_cGuv8/08_military_singer.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/R/RA RE/recruiting001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="How The Real World Ended “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peter Singer analyzes the history of the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy which allows gay, lesbian, and bisexual Americans to serve in the U.S. military as long as they stay quiet about their sexuality. Singer argues a world shaped by reality television has created a new generation of troops more open to allowing homosexuals in the military, and that during this difficult time for recruiting and retaining talent, the military should embrace those willing to serve.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/3rtTp_cGuv8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e64334e-ecd9-4e28-b503-c4783ff188a2</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2008/08_military_singer.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>"Game Changers" and the Military: Exploring Innovation and Leadership</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/C9EqqgI2adU/0731_military.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;July 31, 2008, 11:30 AM to 1:00 PM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/S/SJ SO/skelton001_fs.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brookings’ 21st Century Defense Initiative and the U.S. Army War College hosted Rep. Ike Skelton, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, for a discussion on fostering innovative leaders within the U.S. military. Often referred to as “game changers,” these individuals are essential as the military faces a continually changing global environment. Rep. Skelton speech focused on the deep challenges the military faces in how to foster, train, integrate and retain these unique leaders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/C9EqqgI2adU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6aa449cf-cf7b-42a1-bbe9-2ccf5abb1815</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2008/0731_military.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Australia's Defense and Foreign Policy Priorities</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~3/RAt0Phx1WuQ/0715_australia.aspx</link>
      <description>Event Information:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;July 15, 2008, 9:30 AM to 11:00 AM&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/F/FF FI/fitzgibbon001_fs.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;On July 15, the 21st Century Defense Initiative at Brookings and Lowy Institute for International Policy hosted the Hon. Joel Fitzgibbon MP, the Australian minister for defense. Minister Fitzgibbon outlined the new government’s priorities and discussed the role of the U.S.-Australia alliance in shaping peace and security in the Asia-Pacific region.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/projects/21defense/~4/RAt0Phx1WuQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2f30e27a-762d-4623-afb6-c199a85cf53b</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/events/2008/0715_australia.aspx?rssid=21defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
