<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Brookings: Experts - Adam Thomas</title>
    <link>http://www.brookings.edu/experts/thomasa.aspx?rssid=thomasa</link>
    <description>Brookings Experts Feed</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
      <title>Keep Politics Away from the Promise of Family Planning</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~3/8sTS4_0n4qw/0205_family_planning_thomas_sawhill.aspx</link>
      <description>&lt;img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Images/FeaturetteSmall/C/CF CI/children001_fs.jpg?bc=Transparent&amp;mh=125&amp;mw=125" alt="Keep Politics Away from the Promise of Family Planning" border="0"/&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just before the House approved its version of the stimulus bill, it was stripped of a controversial provision that would have given states the option to expand a Medicaid-funded program subsidizing family planning services for low-income women. Adam Thomas and Isabel Sawhill agree that the family planning provision was rightly stripped from the package, but argue that it is an important program that has the potential to limit the number of unplanned pregnancies, reduce the incidence of abortion, improve child well-being and actually save money in the long-run.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~4/8sTS4_0n4qw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4c61c6d-eb9c-49f4-94a5-a5ed878c6f8e</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0205_family_planning_thomas_sawhill.aspx?rssid=thomasa</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis of Participation Rate Policy Options</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~3/TyAi8ycmrMs/05metropolitanpolicy_thomas.aspx</link>
      <description>WR&amp;amp;B Discussion Paper by Adam Thomas, Senior Research Analyst, the Brookings Institution, May 2002&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~4/TyAi8ycmrMs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f7436a27-9dc0-48b9-83d9-f71805c96a6c</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2002/05metropolitanpolicy_thomas.aspx?rssid=thomasa</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>A Hand Up for the Bottom Third: Toward a New Agenda for Low-Income Working Families</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~3/xTibsxW5tqA/05useconomics_sawhill.aspx</link>
      <description>Paper by Isabel Sawhill, Senior Fellow, and Adam Thomas, Senior Research Analyst, The Brookings Institution, May 2001&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~4/xTibsxW5tqA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">415a40a8-bbf1-4927-ac20-17a02727be39</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2001/05useconomics_sawhill.aspx?rssid=thomasa</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Cut Proposals; Chapter and Verse of a Prudent Compromise</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~3/Di_zi3C9vSg/0211taxes_sawhill.aspx</link>
      <description>Opinion by Isabel Sawhill, Senior Fellow, and Adam Thomas, Senior Research Analyst, The Brookings Institution, in The Houston Chronicle, February 11, 2001&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~4/Di_zi3C9vSg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e3242374-5679-49f5-9df8-e78172f5f454</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2001/0211taxes_sawhill.aspx?rssid=thomasa</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>A Tax Proposal for Working Families with Children</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~3/XJm3pFnTHg8/01childrenfamilies_sawhill.aspx</link>
      <description>In their paper, Isabel Sawhill and Adam Thomas suggest a tax proposal that builds on one of President Bush’s key ideas - an expanded tax credit for families with children - but modifies it in ways that might prove more acceptable to Democrats.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~4/XJm3pFnTHg8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a217de72-cc32-4477-a1d6-fcaf677d34df</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2001/01childrenfamilies_sawhill.aspx?rssid=thomasa</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Gore's Plan Protects the Bottom Third</title>
      <link>http://webfeeds.brookings.edu/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~3/0gy1buVhWgU/0921childrenfamilies_sawhill.aspx</link>
      <description>Gore's Plan Protects the Bottom Third, Opinion in the Los Angeles Times, September 21, 2000, by Isabel Sawhill, Senior Fellow, and Adam Thomes, Senior Research Analyst, Economic Studies, The Brookings Institution&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrookingsRSS/experts/thomasa/~4/0gy1buVhWgU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1d01b397-625c-446a-b275-84ee6518f282</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2000/0921childrenfamilies_sawhill.aspx?rssid=thomasa</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
